Planning Committee Rejects Bid for 24-Hour Adult Gaming Centre in Bridgwater Town Centre
Elena Powell · Aug 26, 2026

Planning Committee Rejects Bid for 24-Hour Adult Gaming Centre in Bridgwater Town Centre
Somerset Council’s planning committee turned down an application from Godden Gaming Organisation, which operates as Palace Amusements, to transform a vacant former WH Smith shop in Bridgwater town centre into a 24-hour adult gaming centre equipped with slot machines, and the decision rested on worries that the venue would worsen existing anti-social behaviour issues in the surrounding area. The company had already secured licensing approval from the council’s licensing team back in November 2025, while Avon and Somerset Police raised no objections to the proposal during the review process. The Godden family has maintained a presence in the UK gaming industry for more than four decades and currently runs over 400 centres across the country, yet the planning committee still cited concerns over potential increases in anti-social behaviour as the primary reason for refusal even though the applicants pointed out that no concrete evidence connected such venues to those problems. Observers note that the licensing team had already completed its own assessment and granted approval months earlier, which created a split between the two council departments handling different aspects of the same project.Details of the Proposed Development
The empty retail unit sits right in the heart of Bridgwater town centre, and the plan called for converting it into an adult gaming centre that would stay open around the clock with rows of slot machines available to customers at any hour. Godden Gaming Organisation submitted the application after identifying the site as suitable for expansion, and the company emphasised its long track record of operating similar facilities without contributing to local disorder. Committee members examined the application during a formal session where they weighed the licensing approval against the separate planning considerations, and they ultimately decided that the risk of increased anti-social behaviour outweighed other factors presented in the submission. The refusal highlights how planning decisions can diverge from licensing outcomes even when both fall under the same local authority, since the licensing team had already cleared the operation while the planning committee focused on land-use impacts and community effects. Those who reviewed the case noted that Avon and Somerset Police had reviewed the details and offered no objections, which left the anti-social behaviour concerns resting on general perceptions rather than specific incident data tied to the proposed site.Company Response and Industry Context
Godden Gaming Organisation responded to the refusal by stating that its four decades of experience and operation of more than 400 centres demonstrated no established link between adult gaming venues and rises in anti-social behaviour, and the family business argued that the decision lacked supporting evidence from local records or police reports. The company’s licensing approval from November 2025 remained valid as a separate matter, yet the planning rejection blocked the physical conversion of the former WH Smith premises regardless of that earlier clearance. People familiar with similar applications have seen cases where planning committees apply stricter tests on location and community impact even after licensing teams have already signed off on operational standards.
The split between licensing and planning functions within Somerset Council illustrates a common procedural separation in local government where different teams evaluate distinct criteria, and in this instance the planning committee placed greater weight on neighbourhood concerns than on the absence of police objections. According to the details released after the meeting, the committee concluded that the 24-hour operation could draw additional footfall during late hours and potentially intensify existing issues in the town centre without sufficient mitigation measures proposed in the application.